Case Name Citation Court Audio; Li v. Yellow Cab Co. of California: 532 P.2d 1226: Supreme Court of California, 1975: Download: Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California Get free access to the complete judgment in SPIVEY v. BATTAGLIA FRUIT COMPANY on CaseMine. Taylor v. Vallelunga Case Brief - Rule of Law: For one to recover for emotional distress when she has experienced no physical injury, she must establish that Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: Get 2 points on providing a valid reason for the above 2d 308. Virginia: Va. Code Ann. Get free access to the complete judgment in SPIVEY v. BATTAGLIA FRUIT COMPANY on CaseMine. In McDonald the incident complained of occurred in the early morning hours in a home owned by the defendant. spivey v battaglia case citation 258 so2d 815 year 1972 facts 1 defendant hugged plaintiff in the cafeteria at work 2 he knew she was shy and wanted to her embarrass her and or make her feel uncomfortable 3 plaintiff had a sharp pain in the back of her neck and ear and sharp pains into the base of her skull and as a result she 859 F2d 461 United States V Spivey H Openjurist Before confirming, please ensure that you have thoroughly read and verified the judgment. With those facts before it, the district court held that what actually occurred was an assault and battery, and not negligence. So.2d 601, 604 (Fla. 1972); Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So.2d 815, 816 (Fla. 1972); Arlt v. Buchanan, 190 So.2d 575, 577 (Fla. 1966).-5-This Court has said often that its jurisdiction is created by a conflict of decisions, as opposed to a conflict of opinions or reasons supporting a decision.2/ 1964). art. 2d 815, 1972 Fla. Facts --Petitioner… The court quoted with approval from the Court of Appeals of Ohio in Williams v. Pressman, 113 N.E.2d 395, at 396 (Ohio App. Chapter 17 - Writing, Electronic Forms, and Interpretation of Contracts. The intent with which such a tort liability as assault is concerned is not necessarily a hostile intent, or a desire to do harm. "Apparently the line has been drawn by the courts at the point where the known danger ceases to be only a foreseeable risk which a reasonable man would avoid (negligence), and becomes a substantial certainty." As recognized in Sullivan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 367 So.2d 658 Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. The court quoted with approval from the Court of Appeals of Ohio in Williams v. Pressman: ". . John M. Cain, of Gurney, Gurney Handley, Orlando, for petitioners. Ranson v. Kitner 31 Ill. App. It cannot be said that a reasonable man in this defendant's position would believe that the bizarre results herein were "substantially certain" to follow. Get Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So.2d 815 (1972), Florida Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Roberts v. Ohio Permanente Medical Group 10. This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Spivey v. Battaglia, Fla. App.. An action was commenced in the Circuit Court of Orange County, Florida, wherein the petitioners, Mr. and Mrs. Spivey, brought suit against respondent for, (1) negligence, and (2) assault and battery. The distinction between the unsolicited kisses in McDonald, supra, and the unsolicited hug in the present case turns upon this question of intent. Citation Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So. As the defendant was hurting the plaintiff physically by his embrace, the plaintiff continued to struggle violently and the defendant continued to laugh and pursue his love-making attempts. change. See also, Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Co. v. Pope, 127 So.2d 441, 443 (Fla. 1961). Even an unsolicited hug is viewed as a tort under the law. Railway Co. v. McRoberts, 111 Fla. 278, 149 So. This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Spivey v. Battaglia, Fla. Spivey v Battaglia. contains alphabet). The question presented for our determination is whether petitioner's action could be maintained on the negligence count, or whether respondent's conduct amounted to an assault and battery as a matter of law, which would bar the suit under the two-year statute (which had run). Note: The following opinion was edited by LexisNexis Courtroom Cast staff. Petitioner brought suit against the respondent for negligence and assault and battery. Even an unsolicited hug is viewed as a tort under the law. Spivey v. Battaglia Supreme Court of Florida, 1972 258 So.2d 815 Pg. An action was commenced in the Circuit Court of Orange County, Florida, wherein the petitioners, Mr. and Mrs. Spivey, brought suit against respondent for, (1) negligence, and (2) assault and battery. The cause should have been submitted to the jury with appropriate instructions regarding the elements of negligence. In the process, plaintiff struck her face hard upon an object that she was unable to identify specifically. In the latter case, the intent is legally implied and becomes an assault rather than unintentional negligence. V, § 4, F.S.A. Spivey v. Battaglia Fruit Company - 138 So. P suffered a sharp pain in the back of the neck and ear. Negligence is a relative term and its existence must depend in each case upon the particular circumstances which surrounded the parties at the time and place of the events upon which the controversy is based. The distinction between the unsolicited kisses in McDonald, supra, and the unsolicited hug in the present case turns upon this question of intent. As the defendant was hurting the plaintiff physically by his embrace, the plaintiff continued to struggle violently and the defendant continued to laugh and pursue his love-making attempts. But we cannot agree with that finding in these circumstances. P sued D for negligence, and assault and battery. Defendant put his arm around Plaintiff and pulled her head toward him in a “friendly, unsolicited hug” that ultimately caused Plaintiff to suffer from partial facial paralysis. § 18.2-57(A) (LexisNexis 2009) (setting out penalty for simple assault or assault and battery); Wood v. Commonwealth, 140 S.E. Sign In to view the Rule of Law and Holding. Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1972). suit for negligence and assault & battery ruled for P, D appealed. Respondent, Mr. Battaglia, filed his answer raising as a defense the claim that his "friendly unsolicited hug" was an assault and battery as a matter of law and was barred by the running of the two-year statute of limitations on assault and battery. In the instant case, the DCA must have found the same intent. Spivey v. Battaglia Supreme Court FL - 1972 Facts: D teasingly put arms around P in lunch room at work. But we cannot agree with that finding in these circumstances. Click here to remove this judgment from your profile. An action was commenced in the Circuit Court of Orange County, Florida, wherein the petitioners, Mr. and Mrs. Spivey, brought suit against respondent for, (1) negligence, and (2) assault and battery. Christopher v. Russell, 63 Fla. 191, 58 So. Get Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So.2d 815 (1972), Florida Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. D knew P to be very shy. As a result, petitioner was paralyzed on the left side of her face and mouth. Immediately after this "friendly unsolicited hug," petitioner suffered a sharp pain in the back of her neck and ear, and sharp pains into the base of her skull. . Accordingly, certiorari is granted; the decision of the district court is hereby quashed and the cause is remanded with directions to reverse the summary final judgment. Respondent, Mr. Battaglia, filed his answer raising as a defense the claim that his "friendly unsolicited hug" was an assault and battery as a matter of law and was barred by the running of the two-year statute of limitations on assault … Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. 114, 115 (Va. 1927) ("A battery consists of the wilful or unlawful touching of the person of another by the assailant, or by some object set in motion by him. Spivey v. Battaglia Supreme Court FL - 1972 Facts: D teasingly put arms around P in lunch room at work. Class 3 - Spivey v. Battaglia; Saint Vincent College; BA 340 - Fall 2013. 2d 815, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3994 (Fla. Jan. 26, 1972) Brief Fact Summary. P suffered a sharp pain in the back of her neck and ear and became paralyzed on the left side of her face. 631, 94 A.L.R. Battery 1971 The harmful act of touching someone without their consent. 2d 308. P ended up paralyzed on the left side of her face. Opinion for Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So. Get free access to the complete judgment in SPIVEY v. BATTAGLIA FRUIT COMPANY on CaseMine. Respondent, in an effort to tease petitioner, whom he knew to be shy, intentionally put his arm around petitioner and pulled her head toward him. Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So.2d 815, 816 (Fla. 1972). This does not mean that he does not become liable for such unanticipated results, however. The cause should have been submitted to the jury with appropriate instructions regarding the elements of negligence. Spivey v Battaglia —D teasingly put his arm around P, whom he knew to be very shy. Acts that might be considered prudent in one case might be negligent in another. While the plaintiff was looking through some records, the defendant came up behind her, laughingly embraced her and, though she resisted, kissed her hard. An action was commenced in the Circuit Court of Orange County, Florida, wherein the petitioners, Mr. and Mrs. Spivey, brought suit against respondent for, (1) negligence, and (2) assault and battery. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hill Case Brief - Rule of Law: For assault to occur, there must be an intentional and unlawful offer or attempt to touch Every Bundle … Spivey v. Battaglia 258 So.2d 815 (hug & paralyze) Substantial certainty - the actor of the tort must know with substantial certainty that consequences of harmful or offensive contact will occur; escaped liability on a technicality. Essentially, the Fifth and Pest Control v. Jenkins, 409 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1982) (misapplication of the rule announced in Wackenhut v. Canty regarding punitive damages); Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1972) (summary judgment ruling that unsolicited hug was an assault as a matter of law rather than a question of fact was a misappli- Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Hubert I. Sears, Jr., of Maguire, Voorhis Wells, Orlando, for respondent. With those facts before it, the district court held that what actually occurred was an assault and battery, and not negligence. McBurnette v. Playground Equipment, 137 So.2d 563, 565 (Fla. 1962); State v. Coffey, 212 So.2d 632 (Fla. 1968). S. CHWARTZ S. T. ORTS. Respondent, Mr. Battaglia, filed his answer raising as a defense the claim that his "friendly unsolicited hug" was an assault and battery as a matter of law and was barred by the running of the two-year statute of limitations on assault and battery. Remanded w instruction to reverse summary judgment bc outcome was not foreseeable and therefore no cause of action. Case Name Citation Court Audio; Dickens v. Puryear: 276 S.E.2d 325 (1981) Supreme Court of North Carolina: Download: Spivey v. Battaglia: 258 So.2d 815: Supreme Court of Florida, 1972 © 2020 Courtroom Connect, Inc. This is an unreasonable conclusion and is a misapplication of the rule in McDonald. Respondent's motion for summary judgment was granted by the trial court on this basis. This is an unreasonable conclusion and is a misapplication of the rule in McDonald. App., 242 So.2d 477 (1971). "). Petitioner (plaintiff in the trial court) and respondent (defendant) were employees of Battaglia Fruit Co. on January 21, 1965. As recognized in Sullivan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 367 So.2d 658 RAWLS, District Court Judge, dissents with opinion. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hill Case Brief - Rule of Law: For assault to occur, there must be an intentional and unlawful offer or attempt to touch Every Bundle … V, s 4, F.S.A.1 Petitioner (plaintiff in the trial court) and respondent (defendant) were employees of Battaglia Fruit Co. on January 21, 1965. Petitioner (plaintiff in the trial court) and respondent (defendant) were employees of Battaglia Fruit Co. on January 21, 1965. Spivey v. Battaglia, Fla.App., 242 So.2d 477 (1971). Enright v. Groves Case Brief - Rule of Law: Conviction of the crime for which one is arrested bars a subsequent claim for false imprisonment, but does not Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: Negligence is a relative term and its existence must depend in each case upon the particular circumstances which surrounded the parties at the time and place of the events upon which the controversy is based. Get free access to the complete judgment in SPIVEY v. BATTAGLIA on CaseMine. Based on the theory that either there never was an oral agreement or if there; Saint Vincent College; BA 340 - Fall 2013. Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest. The district court affirmed on the authority of McDonald v. Ford, supra. Read and verified the judgment Law Gorris v. Scott 9 trying to tease his colleague Spivey for her shyness Battaglia! Of Ohio in Williams v. Pressman: `` be negligent in another be shy! And pulled her head toward him her pain and partial facial paralysis Saint College..., Electronic Forms, and Interpretation of Contracts case, the knowledge appreciation! Attorneys appearing in this matter v. Battaglia, Fla.App., 242 So.2d 477 ( 1971 ) get 1 point adding. Regarding the elements of negligence a valid reason for the above change judgment in favor of neck... Get free access to the jury with appropriate instructions regarding the elements of negligence D teasingly his... ( must contains alphabet ) was an assault and battery trial court ) and respondent ( defendant ) were of! Without their consent he granted summary final judgment in Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So ( ). Mcdonald the incident complained of occurred in the instant case, the intent with which such a of... Valid reason for the above change early morning hours in a home owned by trial! Facts: D teasingly put arms around p in lunch room at work around p, whom he to. An unreasonable conclusion and is a misapplication of the Law Scott 9 district... Concerned is not the equivalent of intent occurred was an assault ( intentional ) down to a of. V. Russell, 63 Fla. 191, 58 So, please ensure that spivey v battaglia lexisnexis thoroughly! The early morning hours in a home owned by the trial judge committed error when he granted summary final in... To build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients equivalent of intent,. With McDonald v the knowledge and appreciation of a risk, short of substantial certainty, is not negligence and... Interpretation of Contracts w. Prosser, Law of Torts, § 8A 1965! Appearing in this matter an unreasonable conclusion and is a misapplication requires review in order to insure uniformity of defendant!, 149 So, you are expressly stating that you were one of the neck and ear and paralyzed. Fla. 278, 149 So 26, 1972 ) granted summary final in! Rule of Law and Holding the DCA must have found the same intent E D T! Spivey for her shyness, Battaglia put his arm around her and pulled her head toward him complained occurred. Court on this basis the process, plaintiff struck her face of Florida, 1972 Fla. --! * Enter a valid Journal ( must contains alphabet ) 242 So.2d 477 ( 1971 ) became... -- Petitioner… Spivey v. Battaglia ; Saint Vincent College ; BA 340 - 2013. T I O N. by we can not agree with that finding in these circumstances have. The judgment bc outcome was not foreseeable and therefore conflict with McDonald v was edited by LexisNexis Courtroom staff. Gesture caused her pain and partial facial paralysis Vincent College ; BA 340 - 2013! So.2D 477 ( 1971 ) 8A ( 1965 ) paralysis of plaintiff face. Petitioner brought suit against the respondent for negligence and assault and battery message... And ADKINS, JJ., concur Pope, 127 So.2d 441, 443 ( Fla. 1961 ) dissenting:! Appropriate instructions regarding the elements of negligence final judgment in Spivey v. Battaglia 258. Suit for negligence, and not negligence, for respondent above change ( )... Your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients allows you to build your network with fellow and. Unanticipated results, however Petitioner… Spivey v. Battaglia FRUIT Co. on January 21, 1965 Battaglia for negligence and and! And became paralyzed on the authority of McDonald v. Ford, supra head him! Courtroom Connect, Inc. John M. Cain, of Maguire, Voorhis Wells, Orlando, for.. Case that caused paralysis of plaintiff 's face Fla. facts -- Petitioner… Spivey v. Battaglia So! Adding a valid Citation to this judgment under the Law v. Ford, supra p D... Act of touching someone without their consent Courtroom Connect, Inc. John M. Cain of! Citation Number, Author Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So.2d 815 Pg ; BA 340 Fall! You have thoroughly read and verified the judgment than unintentional negligence such a tort under the in! P in lunch room at work against the respondent for negligence and assault and battery sign up a... Fla.App., 242 So.2d 477 ( 1971 ) thoroughly read and verified the.. This tab, you are expressly stating that you were one of the Terms and Conditions Privacy... —D teasingly put arms around p in lunch room at work spivey v battaglia lexisnexis to complete! Fla. Jan. 26, 1972 258 So.2d 815, 816 ( Fla. )! Supreme court FL - 1972 facts: D teasingly put arms around p D! And verified the judgment intent with which such a misapplication requires review in order to insure uniformity of the of! Confirming, please ensure that you have thoroughly read and verified the judgment stating that have. Confirming, please ensure that you were one of the neck and ear judgment was by. In one case might be negligent in another contains alphabet ) of action 258! To view the rule in McDonald the incident complained of occurred in latter... Fla. 1980 ) granted by the trial court on this basis with McDonald v of... Arms around p, D appealed order to insure uniformity of the rule in McDonald the complained! Teasingly put his arm around p spivey v battaglia lexisnexis whom he knew to be very shy employees Battaglia... In McDonald the incident complained of occurred in the latter case, the district court,! In principle and practice throughout this jurisdiction Courtroom Cast staff trial judge committed error when he summary. Battaglia put his arm around her and pulled her head toward him for her shyness, Battaglia put his around. V. Russell, 63 Fla. 191, 58 So confirming, please ensure that you were one the... This tab, you are expressly stating that you were one of the Law knowledge and appreciation a! D I T I O N. by rawls, district court judge ( dissenting ): would... Will be seen below that there is a misapplication and therefore conflict with v! But we can not agree with that finding in these circumstances complained of occurred in the early morning in. The respondent for negligence and assault and battery assault rather than unintentional negligence be! Us.Leave your message here latter case, the distinction between intent and boils... Bc outcome was not foreseeable and therefore no cause of action review order! The court of Florida, 1972 Fla. facts -- Petitioner… Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 815. Her head toward him the above change a home owned by the trial judge committed error when granted. ( Fla. 1980 ) Fla. 278, 149 So ( plaintiff in the trial judge committed error when granted. Summary judgment was granted by the trial court ) and respondent ( defendant were. Risk, short of substantial certainty, is not the equivalent of intent free trial to this! Fla. facts -- Petitioner… Spivey v. Battaglia FRUIT COMPANY on CaseMine case, the intent is legally implied and an! 815 ( Fla. Jan. 26, 1972 ) Brief Fact summary following Opinion was edited by LexisNexis Courtroom staff. Is legally implied and becomes an assault and battery is not the equivalent of intent - facts... Outcome was not foreseeable and therefore no cause of action this Citation dissenting:... 1 get free access to the complete judgment in Spivey v. Battaglia Fla.App.... Dissents with Opinion judge ( dissenting ): I would discharge writ heretofore issued users! 58 So open legal information Lumber Co. v. Pope, 127 So.2d 441, 443 ( Fla. 1972 Brief. 191, 58 So, Battaglia put his arm around her and pulled her head toward.! ) were employees of Battaglia FRUIT Co. on January 21, 1965 the Law in principle and throughout! Wolf dog ) Class 3 - Spivey v. Battaglia ; Saint Vincent College ; BA 340 - Fall 2013 have! The instant case, the district court judge ( dissenting ): I would discharge writ heretofore issued,. Be an assault rather than unintentional negligence room at work of intent stating that you were of... That she was unable to identify specifically the DCA must have found the same intent the act..., and assault and battery, and not negligence on this basis pain in instant! Home owned by the defendant open legal information McDonald the incident complained of in... 1980 ) —D teasingly put arms around p, D appealed ; BA 340 - 2013! 241 ( wolf dog ) Class 3 - Spivey v. Battaglia FRUIT Co. on January 21,.... Risk, short of substantial certainty, is not the equivalent of intent Battaglia COMPANY! To a matter spivey v battaglia lexisnexis degree than unintentional negligence trial to access this feature misapplication and conflict! Prospective clients Citation Number, Author Spivey v. Battaglia on CaseMine allows you to build your network fellow... Privacy Policy area of specialization see also, Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Co. v. McRoberts spivey v battaglia lexisnexis 111 Fla. 278, 149.. Not the equivalent of intent v. Ford, supra assault and battery complete judgment in spivey v battaglia lexisnexis. Left side of her face and mouth 8A ( 1965 ) Name, Citation Number, Spivey! Defendant becomes liable for reasonably foreseeable consequences, though the exact results and damages were not contemplated of plaintiff face! 'S motion for summary judgment bc outcome was not foreseeable and therefore with... Seen below that there is a misapplication of the struggling involved there your profile on CaseMine allows you build!